The Design Lodge
Reflections on the “studio” and a lexical shift towards life-centred architectural education
This essay posits the role that the spaces for architectural production have played in supporting a design ethos that has historically neglected our relationship with the Land, and how its reconceptualization could contribute to a ‘spiritual and cultural’ shift through a placed-based ethical framework. More specifically, the space where design typically takes place is most often described in English as the “studio”, a term that has been adopted by universities and professional offices alike, and is broadly considered the core of architectural education and production around the world. Yet, surprisingly, we rarely question - why a “studio”? What is the nature of a “studio” exactly, and how does this potentially impact how we teach design and, subsequently, what we design? Can an element of the sacred infiltrate the spaces of architectural production in the twenty-first century in an effort to prioritize the flourishing of all life on our planet, and how can Indigenous knowledge guide us along this path? The essay first examines the history of the “studio” and questions its ongoing relevance, as well as recent alternatives. This is followed by a proposition for the concept of a “design lodge” that might best be able to inspire “transformational” change in architectural education by transcending conventional fixations on object-centred design.
Bonfitto, Peter. (Ed.) World Architecture and Society: From Stonehenge to One World Trade Center. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2021.
Brocato, Kay. “Studio Based Learning: Proposing, Critiquing, Iterating Our Way to Person-Centeredness for Better Classroom Management.” Theory Into Practice 48 (2009): 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840902776459
Buren, Daniel. 1979. “The Function of the Studio.” Translated by Thomas Repensek. October, Autumn 10: 51-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/778628
Cardinal, Douglas. Of the spirit: Writings by Douglas Cardinal. Edited by George Melnyk. Edmonton: NeWest Press, 1977.
Cardinal, Douglas, and Armstrong, Jeanette. The Native creative process: A collaborative process. Penticton, BC: Theytus, 1991.
Carpenter, Russell, Valley, Leslie, Napier, Trenia, and Apostel, Shawn. 2013. “Studio pedagogy: A model for collaboration, innovation and space design.” In Cases on high education spaces: Innovation, collaboration and technology. Edited by Russel G. Carpenter. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 313-329. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2673-7.ch016
Centre for Environmental Health Equity. “Gikinoo’amaagewin Wiigwaam.” Accessed January 26, 2022. https://cehe.ca/gikinooamaagewin-wiigwaam/
Charrin, François. “Spirit, a keyword of organic architecture: Frank Llyod Wright as a mystical and spiritual architect.” Journal of architecture, planning and environmental engineering 441 (Nov, 1992): 151-158. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijax.441.0_151
Cole, Michael, and Pardo, Mary. (Eds.) Inventions of the studio: Renaissance to Romanticism. Chapel Hill, London: The University of North Carolina Press, 2005.
Davidts, W.J. and Paice K. (Eds.) The fall of the studio: Artists at work. Amsterdam: Valiz, 2009.
Dutton, Thomas. “Design studio and pedagogy.” Journal of Architectural Education 41, 1 (1987): 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1987.10758461
Fraser, Terrie A. “The Nature of the Studio: An Artist’s Method of Inquiry.” PhD diss., University of Melbourne, 2016.
Hunt, Douglas. “New teaching lodge to provide safe space for Indigenous ways of knowing.” Brock University, 2021. Accessed January 30, 2022. https://brocku.ca/brock-news/2021/06/new-teaching-lodge-to-provide-safe-space-for-indigenous-ways-of-knowing/
Ives, Christopher D., Freeth, Rebecca, and Fischer, Joern. “Inside-out sustainability: The neglect of inner worlds.” Ambio 49 (2020): 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01187-w
Lemaire, Rebecca. “Organic architecture and Indigenous design tenets: Frank Lloyd Wright in relation to the work of Douglas Cardinal.” Journal of the Society for the Study of Architecture in Canada 38, 2 (2013): 87-94.
Koutsoumpos, Leonidas. 2009. “Inhabiting Ethics: Educational Praxis in the Design Studio, the Music Class and the Dojo.” PhD diss, University of Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-015-0113-8
Koutsoumpos, Leonidas, and Zhuang, Yue. “Phronēsis and Dao: Cultivating Ethics and Wisdom in the Process of Making Architecture.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 9, 2 (2016): 213-228.
Mackey, Albert G. A lexicon of Freemasonry. Philadelphia: Moss, Brother and Co., 1859.
Manganaro, Valentina. 2022. “St. Jerome in his study: A new humanist iconography.” Hypercritic. Accessed July 10, 2022. https://www.hypercritic.org/experience/art/antonello-da-messina-saint-jerome-in-his-study-painting-1475/
Robbins, Mark. 2002. “Preface.” In University community design partnerships: Innovators in practice, edited by Jason Pearson and series edited by Mark Robbins. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Pedri-Spade, Celeste and Pitawanakwat, Brock. “Indigenization in universities and its role in continuing settler-colonialism.” Janus Unbound: Journal of Critical Studies 1, 1 (Spring 2022): 12-35.
Petahtegoose, Art. “Laurentian wiigwaam teaching with Art Petahtegoose.” Laurentian University, 2021. Accessed January 12, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfkuf7M916o&t=943s
Porter, Joy. Native American Freemasonry: Associationalism and performance in America. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvq4c1mp
Schön, Donald. “The Architectural Studio as an Exemplar of Education for Reflection-in-Action.” Journal of Architectural Education 38, 1 (1984): 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1984.10758345
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 2015. “Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action.” Accessed May 15, 2022. https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Calls_to_Action_English2.pdf.
Ward, A. 1990. “Ideology, culture and the design studio.” Design Studies 11, 1 (1990): 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(90)90010-A
Copyright (c) 2022 David Fortin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal which is under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).