Data, Data Everywhere, Not a Lot in Sync Reconciling Visual Meaning With Data

Main Article Content

Pieter Marthinus de Kock


Up to 100 billion devices will be seeking to visually map out our existence over the internet by 2020 (UK Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2014). Just as the urban is a forcefield “of spatial transformations… that takes many different morphological forms” (Brenner 2014), this paper explores another underlying forcefield: our visual relationship with data. The most important piece of data, the individual, exists in the city as both prey and predator; having evolved from a “passive aesthetic view of the city” (Appleyard 1979, 144); transformed through shared territory (Evans and Jones 2008); and forged into impressively intricate sets of power relations through collective intentionality (Searle 2011). Through the presentation of self (Goffman, 1969, cited in Appleyard 1979, 146) we inhabit another home: the digital; in which we are simultaneously co-existent and removed by synchronisation of data. Traditionally, the software authoring the physical production of ‘space/hardware’ has been value driven (Raban, 1974, 128, cited in Appleyard 1979, 146). In a parallel universe, algorithms drive the data. For Ellis (2012) it is in the software, that meaning resides. What then is the allure of data to the individual? And what is the allure of the individual to data? It lies arguably in the perception of power and control through meaning (Appleyard, Searle et al.). We seek in the new reality to “discover where the real power lies” (Appleyard 1979, 146). Curiously, the power of data appears to increase the irrelevancy of ownership, between “ours” and “theirs” (Appleyard 1979, 152). This paper analyses past, present, and future states of data production. The data we get from data; data produced from objects; and objects produced from data. In closing, a speculative working hypothesis is presented of visual data production, which hopefully encourages further research reconciling data with meaning in the context of visual sustainability.

Article Details

How to Cite
de Kock, P. “Data, Data Everywhere, Not a Lot in Sync”. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, Vol. 16, no. 2, Nov. 2019, pp. 32 -49, doi:10.17831/enq:arcc.v16i2.582.
Peer Reviewed Papers


Ahrens, Chandler, and Aaron Sprecher, eds. 2019. Instabilities and Potentialities: Notes on the Nature of Knowledge in Digital Architecture. New York: Routledge.
Appleyard, Donald. 1979. ‘The Environment as a Social Symbol: Within a Theory of Environmental Action and Perception’. Journal of the American Planning Association 45 (2): 143–53. doi:10.1080/01944367908976952.
Bader, Christoph, Dominik Kolb, James C. Weaver, Sunanda Sharma, Ahmed Hosny, João Costa, and Neri Oxman. 2018. ‘Making Data Matter: Voxel Printing for the Digital Fabrication of Data across Scales and Domains’. Science Advances 4 (5): eaas8652. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aas8652.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. Simulations. Foreign Agents Series. New York City, N.Y., U.S.A: Semiotext(e), Inc.
Bies, Alexander J., Daryn R. Blanc-Goldhammer, Cooper R. Boydston, Richard P. Taylor, and Margaret E. Sereno. 2016. ‘Aesthetic Responses to Exact Fractals Driven by Physical Complexity’. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10 (May). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00210.
Boulkenafed, Malika, Fabrice Michel, and Rejeb Sfar. 2019. ‘(73) Assignee: DASSAULT SYSTEMES, Velizy Villacoublay (FR )’, 15.
Brenner, Neil. 2014. Neil Brenner : Urban Ideologies and the Critique of Neoliberal Urbanization.
———. 2018. ‘Debating Planetary Urbanization: For an Engaged Pluralism’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36 (3): 570–90. doi:10.1177/0263775818757510.
Cairns, Graham, ed. 2017. Visioning Technologies: The Architectures of Sight. London ; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Chalmers, David J., Robert M. French, and Douglas R. Hofstadter. 1992. ‘High-Level Perception, Representation, and Analogy: A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Methodology’. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 4 (3): 185–211. doi:10.1080/09528139208953747.
Cullen, Gordon. 1995. The Concise Townscape. Oxford ; Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Cuthbert, Alexander. 2017. ‘Urban Decay and Regeneration: Context and Issues’. Journal of Urban Design 22 (2): 140–43. doi:10.1080/13574809.2017.1288873.
David Hockney - The Art of Seeing. 2018.
De Kock, Pieter M. 2019. ‘The Meaning in Seeing: Visual Sustainability in the Built Environment’. Edited by Ellyn Lester. AMPS Proceedings Series 16. Stevens Institute of Technology, New Jersey. 17 – 19 June.
De Landa, Manuel. 2009. Manuel De Landa. Dualities of Meaning in Gilles Deleuze. 2009 2/8.
———. 2011. Manuel DeLanda. Deleuze, Subjectivity, and Knowledge. 2011.
———. 2012. Manuel DeLanda. Assemblage Theory, Society, and Deleuze. 2011.
———. 2016. Assemblage Theory. Speculative Realism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
‘DeCodingSpaces Toolbox | Computational Analysis and Generation of STREET NETWORKS, PLOTS and BUILDINGS’. 2019.
Duin, A. Hill, D. Willow, J. Abel, A. Doering, L. Dunne, and M. Isaka. 2018. ‘Exploring the Future of Wearables and Embodied Computing: A Report on Interdisciplinary Collaboration’. In 2018 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 47–50. doi:10.1109/ProComm.2018.00018.
Eggers, William D, Rob Hamill, Abed Ali, and Illustration John Hersey. 2013. ‘Government’s Role in Facilitating the Exchange’, 15.
Ellard, Colin. 2015. Places of the Heart: The Psychogeography of Everyday Life. New York: Bellevue Literary Press.
Evans, James, and Phil Jones. 2008. ‘Rethinking Sustainable Urban Regeneration: Ambiguity, Creativity, and the Shared Territory’. Environment and Planning A 40 (6): 1416–34. doi:10.1068/a39293.
Farias, Ignacio, and Thomas Bender, eds. 2010. Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. Questioning Cities. London ; New York: Routledge.
Feldman, David. 2019a. Fractals and Scaling: A Tour through the Dimensions.
———. 2019b. Fractals and Scaling: Summary of Course.
Gibson, James J. 1975. ‘Pickford and the Failure of Experimental Esthetics’. Leonardo 8 (4): 319. doi:10.2307/1573011.
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2016. A 3-D Material That Folds, Bends and Shrinks on Its Own.
Haun, Andrew M., Giulio Tononi, Christof Koch, and Naotsugu Tsuchiya. 2017. ‘Are We Underestimating the Richness of Visual Experience?’ Neuroscience of Consciousness 2017 (1). doi:10.1093/nc/niw023.
Hockney, David. 2019. ‘Digital Movies : Digital : Works | David Hockney’.
Holland, John H. 2008. Modeling Complex Adaptive Systems.
Holland, John H. 2012. Signals and Boundaries: Building Blocks for Complex Adaptive Systems. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Itti, Laurent, and Christof Koch. 2001. ‘Computational Modelling of Visual Attention’. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 (3): 194–203. doi:10.1038/35058500.
Johnson-Roberson, Matthew, Charles Barto, Rounak Mehta, Sharath Nittur Sridhar, Karl Rosaen, and Ram Vasudevan. 2016. ‘Driving in the Matrix: Can Virtual Worlds Replace Human-Generated Annotations for Real World Tasks?’ ArXiv:1610.01983 [Cs], October.
Jordan B Peterson. 2017. 2017 Personality 02/03: Historical & Mythological Context.
Koch, Christof, Marcello Massimini, Melanie Boly, and Giulio Tononi. 2016. ‘Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Progress and Problems’. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 17 (5): 307–21. doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.22.
Makin, Alexis D J. 2018. ‘The Gap Between Aesthetic Science and Aesthetic Experience’, 30.
Mandelbrot, Benoit. 2010. Benoit Mandelbrot: Fractals and the Art of Roughness.
Matzner, Tobias. 2019. ‘The Human Is Dead – Long Live the Algorithm! Human-Algorithmic Ensembles and Liberal Subjectivity’. Theory, Culture & Society 36 (2): 123–44. doi:10.1177/0263276418818877.
McCann, Eugene, Ananya Roy, and Kevin Ward. 2013. ‘Assembling/Worlding Cities’. Urban Geography 34 (5): 581–89. doi:10.1080/02723638.2013.793905.
McFarlane, Colin. 2009. ‘Translocal Assemblages: Space, Power and Social Movements’. Geoforum 40 (4): 561–67. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.05.003.
———. 2011. ‘The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (4): 649–71. doi:10.1068/d4710.
McLeod, S.A. 2008. ‘Visual Perception Theory’.
Mills, Mark P. 2016. ‘The Internet Of Things Won’t Be Big It’ll Be Huge’. Forbes.
Mitchell, Melanie. 2012. Melanie Mitchell on ‘Using Analogy to Discover the Meaning of Images.’
———. 2018. Introduction to Complexity: Information, Order, and Randomness.
———. 2019. Introduction to Complexity: Introduction to Fractals.
Norman, Don. 2011. Living With Complexity.
———. 2014. Don Norman: Living with Complexity.
Ortman, Scott. 2011. 2011 - Steps Toward a Cognitive Science of Prehistory.
———. 2012. Reading Ancient Minds: Metaphor, Culture, and Complexity.
Owen, Ceridwen, and Kim Dovey. 2008. ‘Fields of Sustainable Architecture’. The Journal of Architecture 13 (1): 9–21. doi:10.1080/13602360701865373.
Pandey, Ananta. 2019. ‘What Makes a Public Space Great?’ Sidewalk Talk. March 29.
Pavez, Eduardo, Philip A. Chou, Ricardo L. de Queiroz, and Antonio Ortega. 2018. ‘Dynamic Polygon Clouds: Representation and Compression for VR/AR’. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing 7. doi:10.1017/ATSIP.2018.15.
Raine, Derek. 2012. Causality and Complexity, Derek Raine.
Reiss, Spencer, and Nicholas Carr. 2007. ‘Q&A: Author Nicholas Carr on the Terrifying Future of Computing’. Wired, December 20.
Rezende, Danilo Jimenez, S M Ali Eslami, Shakir Mohamed, Peter Battaglia, Max Jaderberg, and Nicolas Heess. 2016. ‘Unsupervised Learning of 3D Structure from Images’, 9.
Rodaway, Paul. 2011. Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense, and Place. 1. iss. in paperback. London: Routledge.
Safitri, Diah Wahyu, and Dwi Juniati. 2017. ‘Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Fractal Dimension Analysis of Eye Fundus Image’. In , 020011. Surabaya, Indonesia. doi:10.1063/1.4994414.
Sartwell, Crispin. 2017. ‘Beauty’. Edited by Edward N Zalta. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 18.
Searle, John. 2011. John Searle on Language & Social Ontology.
———. 2013. John Searle on Gibson and Direct Perception.
———. 2016. The Problem of Perception & Intentionality (John Searle).
Searle, John, and Robert Pollie. 2015. John Searle on Perception & Philosophy of Mind.
Sharr, Adam. 2007. Heidegger for Architects. Thinkers for Architects. London ; New York: Routledge.
Spehar, Branka, Solomon Wong, Sarah van de Klundert, Jessie Lui, Colin W. G. Clifford, and Richard P. Taylor. 2015. ‘Beauty and the Beholder: The Role of Visual Sensitivity in Visual Preference’. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 (September). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00514.
Stafford, Barbara Maria. 2012. Iconic Turn: Prof. Dr. Barbara Maria Stafford - Towards a Cognitive Image History.
———. 2014a. 140409 Barbara Stafford Images Precisely.
———. 2014b. Selective Attention: Neuroscience and the Art Museum.
———. 2017. Brown Symposium 38 - Barbara M. Stafford.
UK Government Chief Scientific Adviser. 2014. ‘The Internet of Things: Making the Most of the Second Digital Revolution’, 40.
Wachsmuth, David, David J. Madden, and Neil Brenner. 2011. ‘Between Abstraction and Complexity: Meta-Theoretical Observations on the Assemblage Debate’. City 15 (6): 740–50. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.632903.
Wang, June. 2017. ‘Assemblage Urbanism’. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies.
Warren, Matt. 2018. ‘These Stunning 3D Models Are Transforming Scientists’ Raw Data’. Science | AAAS. May 31.
Williams, Rosalind. 2010 ‘Second empire, second nature, secondary world’ in Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. Questioning Cities. eds. Farias, Ignacio, and Thomas Bender. London ; New York: Routledge. 269-290.
Winter, Dan. 2015. FRACTALS, DNA, GOLDEN RATIO - Dan Winter.