Main Article Content
Degradation of ecosystem services, scarcity of resources and the erosion of the planet’s capability to absorb waste is of immediate concern. This situation is novel in its speed, its global and local scale and its threat to the planet and its people. Inspired by the recent discourse of the Anthropocene, this paper explores the convergence of human and nature as they confront generative and destructive forces in two distinctly different settings. Using a case-study approach, this paper adopts the cyborg landscape as a conceptual framework to address the interconnectedness of systems, and scale and poetic brief to accommodate the environment while supporting the needs of our contemporary society. By using nature’s generative capacities as well as its destructive tendencies and by blurring the disciplinary boundaries between interior architecture and landscape architecture, this paper considers two different locations in New Zealand: a post-industrial site on Auckland’s urban waterfront and a remote active volcanic site located on White Island. It finds opportunity to examine intensified inhabitation through acts of immersion and extraction in the “new normal” where nature’s interrelated systems and the artifice of the Anthropocene create innovative and dynamic possibilities. It concludes that the creation of a link between natural processes and responsive technologies can provide solutions to address the complexity of climate change.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal which is under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Arnheim, Rudolf, Wolfgang M. Zucker, and Joseph Watterson. 1966. "Inside and Outside in Architecture: A Symposium." The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25 (1): 3-15. https://doi.org/10.2307/428879
Auckland City Council. 2017 “GeoMaps”. Accessed July 30, 2017. https://geomapspublic.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/viewer/index.html
Benedikt, Michael. 2002. "Environmental stoicism and place machismo." Harvard Design Magazine.
Boas, Tobias, and Kate Marshall. 2014. “Writing the Anthropocene: An Introduction.” Minnesota Review 83 (1): 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-2782243
Caan, Shashi. 2011. Rethinking design and interiors: Human beings in the built environment. London: Laurence King.
Cantrell, Bradley E., and Justine Holzman. 2015. Responsive landscapes: strategies for responsive technologies in landscape architecture. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757735
Castree, N. 2014A. “The Anthropocene and Geography I: The Back Story.” Geography Compass 8 (7): 436-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12141
Castree, N. 2014B. “Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current Contributions.” Geography Compass 8 (7): 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12140
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197-222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
Clarke, Joseph. 2011. "Wagnerism Embodied." Log 23: 59-69.
Clarke, N. 2011. Inhuman nature. London: Sage.
Dalby, Simon. 2014. "Rethinking geopolitics: Climate security in the Anthropocene." Global Policy 5 (1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12074
Fernández-Galiano, Luis. 2000. Fire and memory: On architecture and energy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gissen, David. 2012. Subnature: Architecture's Other Environments. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2017. “Time Matters: on temporality in the Anthropocene. – in conversation with Heather David and Etienne Turpin”. Accessed July 21, 2017. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/12527215.0001.001/1:14/--architecture-in-the-anthropocene-encounters-among-design?rgn=div1;view=fulltext
Gunderson, Lance H., and Lowell Pritchard, eds. 2012. Resilience and the behavior of large-scale systems. Vol. 60. Island Press.
Johnston, Rosemary Ross. 2005. "Landscape as palimpsest, pentimento, epiphany: Lucy Maud Montgomery's interiorisation of the exterior, exteriorisation of the interior." CREArTA.
Johnson, Elizabeth, Harlan Morehouse, Simon Dalby, Jessi Lehman, Sara Nelson, Rory Rowan, Stephanie Wakefield, and Kathryn Yusoff. 2014. "After the Anthropocene: Politics and geographic inquiry for a new epoch." Progress in Human Geography 38 (3): 439-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513517065
Lally, Sean. 2009a. "Twelve Easy Pieces for the Piano." Architectural Design 79 (3): 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.881
Lally, Sean. 2009b. "When cold air sleeps." Architectural Design 79 (3): 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.888
Lally, Sean. 2014. Air from Other Planets: A Brief History of Architecture to Come. Zurich: Lars Muller Publishers.
Lehman, Jessi, and Sara Nelson. 2014. "Experimental politics in the Anthropocene." Progress in Human Geography 38 (3): 444-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513517065
Lewis, Simon L., and Mark A. Maslin. 2015. "Defining the anthropocene." Nature 519 (7542): 171. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258
Lokman, Kees. 2017. "Cyborg landscapes: Choreographing resilient interactions between infrastructure, ecology, and society." Journal of Landscape Architecture 12 (1): 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2017.1301289
Moffitt, Lisa. 2013. "Thermodynamic Optimism: Three Energy/Material Dialogues." Edinburgh Architectural Research Journal 33: 57-64
Pallasmaa, Juhani. 2011. “An Architecture of the Seven Senses”. In Weinthal, Lois, Toward a New Interior: An Anthology of Interior Design Theory, edited by Lois Weinthal, 40-49. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Parrott, Lael, and Wayne S. Meyer. 2012. "Future landscapes: managing within complexity." Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (7): 382-389. https://doi.org/10.1890/110082
Petrović, Emina Kristina, Bruno Marques, Natasha Perkins, and Guy Marriage. 2018. "Phenomenology in Spatial Design Disciplines: Could it Offer a Bridge to Sustainability?." In Advancements in the Philosophy of Design, pp. 285-316. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_14
Power, Jacqueline. 2014. "The liminality of interiority: Australian indigenous cosmological space." In SITUATION Symposium and Exhibition, pp. 88-90.
Rahim, A. 2010. “Interiorities”. Architectural Design 80 (3): 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1038
Rahm, P. “Jade Eco Park Taiwan”. Accessed June 1, 2017. http://www.philipperahm.com/data/projects/taiwan/ index.html.
Rull, V. 2013. “A futuristic perspective on the Anthropocene.” The Holocene 21 (5): 1-4.
Steffen, Will, Jacques Grinevald, Paul Crutzen, and John McNeill. 2017. "The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369 (1938): 842-867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
Turpin, Etienne. 2014. Architecture in the Anthropocene: Encounters among design, deep time, science and philosophy. Michigan: Open Humanities Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.12527215.0001.001
Weinthal, Lois. 2008. "Bridging the Threshold of Interior and Landscape: An Interview with Petra Blaisse." Architectural Design 78 (3): 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.676
Yusof, K. 2013. “Geologic life: prehistory, climate, future in the Anthropocene.” Society & Space 31 (5): 779-795. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11512